|
From:Apple , Apple Computer ,
|
![Mac OS X 10.3 Panther Server 10 Client [OLDER VERSION]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/11SJ8M5PVRL._SL160_.jpg)
See Product Page
|
User Rating: Amazon Sales Rank:#7566 |
| |
1 of 1 customers found the following review helpful:
 Easy Server System, 2007-04-16
I absolutly love Mac OS X Panther Server. It is a dramatic improvement from previous versions and runs much smoother. Moved over from Windows Server 2000 and I will never go back. Workgroup Manager & Server Admin are great!
1 of 3 customers found the following review helpful:
 Very Easy to Set Up, 2004-07-14
I found OS X Server 10.3 very easy to set up. Share points were easy to set up too. Print sharing was a bit confusing to set up, and only works with network PostScript printers. I had hoped to share my three inkjet printers too.Definitely a great product.
3 of 13 customers found the following review helpful:
 Panther server - not as good as OSX 10.1.4 server!, 2004-03-17
Wow, as a user of OSX 10.1.4 server unlimited, I was fairly happy, I trusted Apple to improve things in Panther OSX 10.3.3 Server - oh what a dissapointment! In 10.1.4, the Server Admin is easy to figure out, easy to work with - and they RUINED it in Panther! Now I have a messy obtuse interdependent server admin thing - I can't believe it, there is no obvious way to set up share points! I read through the documentation, and it just doesn't work, probably I need to tweek some scripts on the command line - but hey, if I wanted to do this, I'd get a Windows server. I find OSX 10.1.4 server and Windows 2000 Pro server do a much better job of serving ) OS9.22 clients. Yes, with Panther server, I can see it in on my OS9.22 machine in the same subnet - it shows right up, when I connect it says "negotiating" for 20 seconds. This is with 1 client connected to a
fast machine with tons of ram doing just file sharing! Oh I might figure this
thing (Panther server) out - but if Apple wants me to spend $2,000 to $6,000 getting their training to use this, I'll spend that money getting a Windows 2000 Pro server going - that's no walk in the park, but at least I can figure it out without spending hundreds of hours studying or paying consultants. Sheesh.
|
|
|