|
From:Microsoft , Microsoft Software ,
|
![Microsoft FrontPage 2002 [OLD VERSION]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51JR56PGV4L._SL160_.jpg)
See Product Page
|
User Rating: Amazon Sales Rank:#2536 |
| | Page: << 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 18 >> |
25 of 26 customers found the following review helpful:
 Frontpage on the backshelf, 2003-02-28
If you want a quick and easy website you may be interested in Frontpage, however if you are in the visual mode, dragging and dropping your images etc. the code that is generated in the background becomes very messy, this can produce unwanted effects in your viewers browsers as well as forcing your images in specific places. There is lack of control, exactness and freedom in Frontpage. I also think it is very expensive for the quality. I know that high end web design programs may be intimidating, but I suggest Macromedia's Dreamweaver to the experienced and the beginner as well. It offers design or code mode. If you practice with Dreamweaver's tutorial you will find yourself learning very quickly. If you are a beginner and you use Frontpage, there may be a time where you will want to advance and buy a program like Dreamweaver anyways. If you want to save money, go ahead and buy Dreamweaver, it is not scary, you can learn it easily. You can either stay in the visual mode or as you learn move on to more advanced webpage development.
5 of 6 customers found the following review helpful:
 Microsoft Frontpage is Very Good, 2003-01-29
I learned HTML by hand. As with any editor it's good to know your coding so you can clean up any errors, or add whatever newbies you want. FP makes my work go a whole lot faster and easier. I design websites for several companies and non-profit organizations. I would be at it 24/7. Is the price reasonable? No, not really, but I've tried a lot of editors and there is no comparison. I'd rather pay a few dollars more and get what I need then to wind up with some off the wall cracker jack editor that makes you wonder why you don't just do it all by hand.
7 of 10 customers found the following review helpful:
 Frontpage 2002 would have been great only if it were, 2003-01-12
priced lower. Take a look at namo webeditor which costs only 99 bucks and comes with everything that fronpage offers plus alot more. you should only consider getting frontpage only if you are purchasing a complete set of MS office which includes ms frontpage. Otherwise, stick with namo. namo.com is where you get the price. amazon should work harder to get a better price though.
11 of 14 customers found the following review helpful:
Microsoft FrontPage 2002 is the best!, 2002-12-10
You'll enjoy the ease of working with FrontPage while editing and building your web site. It looks and feels like a cross between Windows Explorer and Microsoft Word. Very logically laid out and the Help section is very detailed. Before buying, make sure the company that hosts your site has the FrontPage 2002 extensions installed. This application just keeps getting better and better.
34 of 35 customers found the following review helpful:
Huge Improvement Over 2000, 2002-11-28
I must say that Front Page 2002 is a dream program compared to the 2000 version. I had some very weird things happen with 2000 such as its not publishing to the web on the index page unless I also saved it in Notepad. All the bugs are gone in 2002 plus it is much easier to use. I use it for everything, rarely using Word, Office and so forth. My two major tools for editing and writing are Front Page and super Notepad instead. I am going to learn Dreamweaver next term at the college where I teach because I am finally ready to move on and learn more about professional web design. Besides, I can now read and write html so I am not as utterly dependent on Front Page as I once was. If you don't know any html coding, the basis of all web pages, Front Page is the program for you. I also do all my image editing in Photoshop so don't even need that function in Front Page. Dreamweaver is the industry standard instead of Front Page yet Front Page is the ordinary user's program of choice. The reason for this is that you can know very little about computers and still make a website with Front Page. It even made publishing websites idiot proof by using Front Page Server extensions with many web host providers. Thus, one can totally skip learning ftp protocol by using Front Page server extensions instead. If someone wants to go professionally into web page design, this is not the product, Dreamweaver is. People who already are professionals in the computer industry or in web design tell me they don't like Front Page. I think the reason is that since they don't need (or want) Front Page to do their work for them, they desire a program which gives them a much freer hand. For the average computer user though, that is all pie in the sky, beyond their reach, and Front Page 2002 will more than do the job for them.
|
| Page: << 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 18 >> |
|