51 of 51 customers found the following review helpful:
Right for some; disaster for me, 2003-03-19 Despite mixed reviews, I bought FP2002 mainly because HoTMeTaL had just become unavailable. I'm a heavy and long-term user of Office products, and am entirely comfortable with them. Purpose of this purchase was to draft look/feel and content of a new web site, which I would hand over to a professional designer for tweaking.Took a very reasonable couple of weeks' effort making what I wanted. Two major issues were unexpected non-ease of importing formatted material from Office, and weird instability in text/graphics positioning: stuff jumps all over the place w/o warning. (I'm running WinXP Home, in case it matters.) Then passed the saved files to a pro running DreamWeaver on Mac. He is completely unable to open many, and others all seem to have a bunch of Java in the HTML code. (Yes, I did turn off all those unneeded options first.) It doesn't seem to be possible to save as simple HTML files with common code. It's going to cost me a great deal of time and money to repeat the whole exercise from scratch. Wish MS hadn't dropped their 30-day free trial, but I can see why. Right for some, no doubt. But if you want compatible code, portable files, or any real idea of what's going on in there (a familiar story with MS?), run away fast.
41 of 42 customers found the following review helpful:
Few are better, and this is essential for some web tasks, 2003-03-14 I am a reluctant user of MS products. Who really wants to give them more money? But there are few better web editors than this. With this version, FrontPage has surpassed Homesite; but DreamWeaver is still better--probably the only better web development application.PROS * Preserves true HTML coding--old versions of FrontPage did not do this * Great project management: easy to create and use templates for managing entire sites * Great WYSIWIG editor: If you know how to use Word, you can make an entire website in FrontPage * Direct access to web host: Don't have to ftp back and forth; if your web host supports FrontPage, you can edit pages directly in your account and see the changes immediately * SHAREPOINT!! The Sharepoint deserves more discussion. Sharepoint is a portal, most likely to be used as an Intranet. It has group calendars, file sharing, etc. You can create and manage your own Sharepoint portal from Frontpage. It is an amazing value for small- to medium-size companies. SHAREPOINT ALONE IS WORTH THE PRICE OF FRONTPAGE! You cannot possibly find a portal for less money. But compare that to the cost of purchasing a comparable portal or leasing one, and this is hands-down a great value. And there is no, I repeat, NO opensource (free) groupware application that can touch Sharepoint yet. (When there is, I'll migrate.) PURCHASING RECOMMENDATION * People who know HTML will code without this product in a text editor * People who want a WYSIWIG development environment should seriously consider this product, though it costs more than some decent WYSIWIG alternatives--nobody else except Dreamweaver comes close to the features FrontPage has * If you want highly dynamic web pages (ASP, CFM, Flash, etc.), get Dreamweaver * If you are interested in a Sharepoint portal, this is a must
12 of 12 customers found the following review helpful:
Save your money! It's a great concept but very buggy!, 2003-03-12 Sadly, I cannot recommend this product. What a good concept, however! Save your money. If you don't believe me at least try their free 30-day trial before purchasing and make your own decision. I love Word and Excel. They just work. Every time. Consistently. I am sad to say Front Page is VERY buggy. I designed a simple website with it. It is intuitive and very easy to learn. I was excited initially as to what I was making. However, in the end, I spent more time trying to solve and work around the bugs it has then I did building my entire site. Images and boxes (for no reason) refused to stay where I put them, ending in the oddest places on the page. Identical layouts that worked fine on five of my seven pages simply wouldn't on the other two. Several times it was easier to abort a few hours of work and re-do it on a clean page then to attempt to make the existing page work. Things that looked fine when I built it and previewed it were in different positions when the site was published. I attempted to use frames and use several photographs as links to other pages; the pages never would open in a new window, as I indicated in the link preferences, but always in the small window of the frame. Support is non-existent. When I exhausted the help menu that comes with the program, the program pointed me to the Internet, Front Page help site, where a search for [website] publishing troubleshooting, returned a message of no topics on the subject! I feel that I had spent the time learning either html or Dreamweaver, or any of the other programs I would be far better off in the long run. Front Page is a great concept for the casual (hobby) designer like me, but sadly it needs a few more months in the de-bugging department before it is ready for serious use.
5 of 5 customers found the following review helpful:
Websites that save time! and time is money!, 2003-03-09 I am currently running 8 websites all with Front page server extensions, and all completely designed with front page. Since every one of my sites require weekly if not daily changes I can't find an easier, faster, and more user friendly piece of software. My significant other majored in I.T. in college and I continue to laugh at what she has to go through to do something I can do in two clicks. It seems to me the bitter sweet reality is if you want to pay someone a few hundred bucks to spell out ASP for you or write Java scripts and HTML by hand, go ahead. I'll pay the price to ole Bill Gates and run with this any day. I simply don't have time to learn the other stuff, (Dreamweaver, Flash, Director etc.) and I sure don't want to pay someone else to do it. It's like a car. I don't care how it works as long as it works. And FRONTPAGE works extremely well for me.
1 of 3 customers found the following review helpful:
Better off learning HTML, 2003-03-06 This software is very cumbersome to work with. The whole point to using this type of software is to make the layouts go faster. When going from normal mode to preview mode or when saving the page to actually use, much of the WYSIWYG is not WYSIWYG! I found that I had to edit the pages in Notepad to get the page layout to look right. I tried to use Frontpage's HTML editor but when I'd save the changes I made, Frontpage would change them back to what they were. You're better of learning HTML and using Notepad to create the page.
|